Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 35(2): 141-144, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1101481

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To test the German Aortic Valve (GAV) score at our university hospital in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: A total of 224 patients who underwent isolated conventional AVR between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Patients with concomitant procedures and transcatheter aortic valve implantation were excluded. Patients' data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients' risk scores were calculated according to criteria described by GAV score. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUC]) were also calculated. The calibration of the model was tested by the Hosmer-Lemeshow method. Results: The mortality rate was 8.04% (18 patients). The patients' mean age was 58.2±19.3 years and 25% of them were female (56 patients). Mean GAV score was 1.73±5.86 (min: 0.0; max: 3.53). The GAV score showed excellent discriminative capacity (AUC 0.925, 95% confidence interval 0.882-0.956; P<0.001). The cutoff "1.8" turned out to be the best discriminatory point with the best combination of sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (75.7%) to predict operative death. Hosmer-Lemeshow method revealed a P-value of 0.687, confirming a good calibration of the model. Conclusion: The GAV score applies to our population with high predictive accuracy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Aortic Valve , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Brazil , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment
3.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(5): 610-614, Sept.-Oct. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1042030

ABSTRACT

Abstract In cases of aortic valve disease, prosthetic valves have been increasingly used for valve replacement, however, there are inherent problems with prostheses, and their quality in the so-called Third World countries is lower in comparison to new-generation models, which leads to shorter durability. Recently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been explored as a less invasive option for patients with high-risk surgical profile. In this scenario, aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) has emerged as another option, which can be applied to a wide spectrum of aortic valve diseases. Despite the promising results, this procedure is not widely spread among cardiac surgeons yet. Spurred on by the last publications, we went on to write an overview of the current practice of state-of-the-art AVNeo and its results.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aortic Valve/surgery , Pericardium/transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Glutaral/therapeutic use , Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty/methods , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL